SmokeLess New Zealand e-News

www.smokeless.org.nz  info@smokeless.org.nz

26 April 2007. NZ SmokeLess e-News 2:4 

Snuffers live longer than smokers: snuff sales will decrease tobacco deaths

Ten basic points on snuff, plus an invitation to unite around an overarching goal.

Following on from

  • SmokeLess New Zealand’s e-News 23 April 2007 notifying the test marketing of snuff, and
  • Smokefree Coalition’s Tobacco Update editorial of 25 April 2007.

__________________________________________________________________________________

 Can tobacco snuff be used to snuff out tobacco smoking? Fight fire with wet tobacco?

 Can continuation of tobacco addiction be used to avert deaths from smoking?

 If we understand how unburnt tobacco differs from smoke in risks and chemistry, it begins to make sense. Smoking is the problem, rather than the tobacco.

__________________________________________________________________________________

1. Smokers who switch to snuff live longer than those who continue to smoke.

Snuff is welcome for two main reasons:

a) Snuffing is much safer than smoking, - as a recent Ministry of Health-commissioned report shows.1

b) Addicted smokers have rights to be told about and to buy alternative products to reduce their risk from tobacco use. Some smokers are fatally trapped in very serious tobacco addiction. Despite clear warnings, 4000 annually quit too late. One in two continuing smokers die many years early.

2) Sales of snuff will decrease tobacco deaths. Snuff has 5-10% of the risks of smoking.2 Even if all current smokers kept on smoking, 10 to 20 new users would have to take up snuff for every one who took up smoking,3 before snuff could cause more deaths than smoking. This will not happen because:

3) Snuff popularity has its limits Even where snuff is traditional and most popular, as in Swedish men, 21% use snuff and 14% smoke, a ratio of only 1.5 to 1.

4) Snuff has to become popular before it can reduce smoking deaths. Snuff sales start from zero this week. Its advertising is banned. Some health groups are opposed.

5) Dual use. Dual use may occur more to begin with, while smokers are in the process of switching. Those using snuff but continuing to smoke (2% in Sweden), smoke fewer cigarettes and inhale less smoke, as only so much nicotine is needed each day. Double jeopardy does not apply.

6) Quitting is safest, and switching is nearly as safe For every 2.5% of smokers who quit smoking permanently, the cigarette death toll eventually falls by 100 deaths a year (2.5% of 4000=100). Relapse however, is common. For every 2.5% of smokers who switched to snuff permanently, the tobacco death toll overall is reduced nearly as much, by 95-99 deaths per year.4 Because of addiction to snuff, fewer are likely to relapse to smoking.

7) Where is the replacement programme to accompany this product? The Ministry of Health may wish to revise its soon-to-be-released Smoking Cessation Guidelines to include this topic. SmokeLess advocates an addictive warning on snuff. www.smokeless.org.nz/nasalsnuff.htm

 

8) Is snuff merely a cigarette replacement for those occasions when smoking is not permitted?

Snuff means no second-hand smoke. Some smokers may wish to use snuff to stay at their work station and not go outside to smoke. With every use of snuff, blood nicotine rises, and the urge to smoke is reduced. Trying snuff is an essential step for smokers to familiarize themselves with it as a prelude to switching to it.

9) The only beneficiaries from snuff .. are the tobacco industry?. Snuff makers hope to develop snuff sales. More importantly, snuff will benefit smokers who switch to snuff – they stand to live many years longer.

10) Let’s not lose sight of the prize

The main prize is averting 4000 cigarette deaths annually, by making smoking less popular and ending cigarette and smoking tobacco sales. This is SmokeLess New Zealand’s main aim. Once this is achieved, the cigarette industry will have nothing to sell.

A call to end cigarette sales

Cigarettes are currently killing one New Zealander every two hours, yet no-one apart from SmokeLess and the Maori Party is asking for cigarette sales to be phased out. As long as cigarette sales remain legal, cigarette smoking can again become popular with a new cohort of teenagers.

 SmokeLess New Zealand invites all anti-smoking groups to work for the achievement of a law to end cigarette sales within ten years,5 (no ban on personal growing, possession, or smoking of tobacco), and to unite around this over-arching goal.

With an agreed goal to end cigarette sales, the various anti-smoking groups can then choose which policies they support to reach the goal.

__________________________________________________________________________

1.Broadstock M. Systematic review of the health effects of modified tobacco products.
 http://nzhta.chmeds.ac.nz/publications/smokeless_tobacco.pdf
(129pp)

2. Levy DT, Mumford EA, Cummings KM, et al. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2004; 13: 2035-42

3. Kozlowski LT, Strasser AA, Giovino GA, et al. Applying the risk/use equilibrium: use medicinal nicotine now for harm reduction. Tobacco Control 2001;10:201–3.

4. Is quitting entirely better than switching to snuff? www.smokeless.org.nz/switchingtosnuff.htm

5. Law changes to end the cigarette smoking mortality epidemic. www.smokeless.org.nz/lawchanges.htm

________________________________________________________________________________________________

 With tobacco, as with alcohol, it is how we use it (in this case smoking it) that is the problem tobacco, as, smoking it) that is the problem.

 

To unsubscribe email chair@smokeless.org.nz  © SmokeLess New Zealand